Hamdard dawakhana vs union of india
WebJan 12, 2024 · The SC in Hamdard Dawakhana v Union of India (1959) case struck down delegation of powers on the grounds that it was vague. It held that the Centre’s power of specifying diseases and conditions under Drug and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act 1954 is ‘uncanalised’, ‘uncontrolled’ , and going beyond the … WebJUDGEMENT. Gajendragadkar, C.J. - (1.)-The two appellants, the Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf), Delhi, and its Mutawalli Haji Hakim Hameed, represent the Hamdard …
Hamdard dawakhana vs union of india
Did you know?
WebS. C. R. 308 and Hamdard Dawakhana (wakf) v. Union of India, [1960] 2 S. C. R. 67 1, referred to. Held, further, that the State could not make a law which directly restricted one guaranteed freedom for securing the better enjoyment of another freedom. Freedom of … WebSep 29, 2024 · Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1959) In the case of Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1959), the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 was challenged on the grounds of violation of Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India. The petitioners in the present case, who were …
WebJul 20, 2024 · Brij Bhushan Vs the State of Delhi, 1950 AIR 129 ↑; Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India, WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.167 OF 2012 ↑; Smt. Prabha Dutt Vs Union of India, 6 1982 SCR (1)1184 ↑; M. Hasan Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1998 AP 35 ↑; Tata Press Ltd. Vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., 1995 AIR 2438 ↑; … WebHamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India AIR 1960 SC 554. 14. In re Delhi Laws Act AIR 1951 SC 332. 15. Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. 1980 SCR (3) 331. 16. ITC Bhadrachalam Paper Boards v. Mandal Revenue Officer (1996) 6 SCC 634. 17. K.
WebNov 1, 2024 · Hamdard Dawakhana v Union of India; In this case, the constitutionality of the Act was challenged on the ground that it infringed on the right to freedom of speech guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) and under 19(1)(f) and (g) which is the right to carry on trade and business. Articles 14, 21 and 31 were also considered to be infringed. It was ... WebThe identity of Assam, the Assamese traditional “Gamosa” has received the tag of Geographical Indication (GI) from the Geographical Indications Registry. A…
WebDEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS BETWEEN JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND INDIA, 1950—'60 Download; XML; MARTIAL LAW IN THE UNITED STATES Download; XML; Constitutional Law—Arts. 19(1) (a), (f) and (g)—delegation of legislative power—advertisements—Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India Download; XML; …
Web18. The combined reading of Hamdard Dawakhana's case MANU/SC/0016/1959 : 1960CriLJ671 and the Indian Express Newspaper's case MANU/SC/0406/1984 : [1986] ... 20. Supreme Court held that the Nigam/Union of India cannot restrain the appellant from publishing "Tata Press Yellow Pages" comprising paid advertisements from … kingtec group vietnam co ltdWebJun 10, 2007 · The Union of India & Ors.(4); The State of Bombay v. F.N. Bulsara (5); Mahant Moti Das v. S. P. Sahi (3). What then was the history behind the impugned legislation and what was the material before the Parliament upon which it … lyle and scott historyWebFirst appeal filed by the Nigam and the Union of India was heard by a learned single judge of the Bombay High Court and the learned judge by the judgment dated April 27, 1994 allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the trial court and decreed the suit. Letters Patent Appeal filed by kingtech auto parts